How did Latin Americans represent their own countries as modern? By treating modernity as a ubiquitous category in which ideas of progress and decadence are far from being mutually exclusive, this book explores how different groups of intellectuals, between the late nineteenth and the early twentieth century, drew from European sociological and medical theories to produce a series of cultural representations based on notions of degeneration. Through a comparative analysis of three country case studies − Argentina, Uruguay and Chile − the book investigates four themes that were central to definitions of Latin American modernity at the turn of the century: race and the nation, the search for the autochthonous, education, and aesthetic values. Using a transnational approach, it shows how civilizational constructs were adopted and adapted in a post-colonial context where cultural modernism foreshadowed economic modernization. In doing this, this work sheds new light on the complex discursive negotiations through which the idea of ‘Latin America’ became gradually established in the region.
‘Two key ideas are at the core of Coletta's important book on Spanish American modernities at the turn of the twentieth century. The first is that a common thread runs through the ways in which these 'multiple modernities' unfolded in the region: the widely accepted polarity between 'progress' and 'degeneration' (or 'civilization' and 'barbarism') can be seen, rather than as a rigid relation between opposites, as an intrinsically complementary one. [...] The second idea that informs the book is that the notion of 'Latinity' is key to understanding the forces of regeneration that were advocated to free the young American nations from modernity's 'degenerative' tendencies.’
Eduardo Zimmermann, Estudios Interdisciplinarios de América Latina y el Caribe
‘The book makes use of extensive primary sources, from which telling details are selected. It gathers together key contributions from the time (for example, that of Carlos Octavio Bunge) as well as those contributions that history has unfairly – though perhaps inevitably – forgotten. It is at its most effective when working outwards from these texts.’
Adam Sharman, Journal of Latin American Studies
Click here if you are not redirected automatically